SysV IPC: eyesore or misunderstood art?

[Joe Kalash]

In article <8015 at june.cs.washington.edu> ka at june.cs.washington.edu (Kenneth Almquist) writes:
>
>The decision to include IPC in the SVID (assuming it's there; someone
>correct me if I'm wrong) really contradicts the original view of the
>purpose of the System V IPC.


The System V IPC is in the SVID, however it is part of the optional
kernal extension module (as is shared memory, and semaphores).

		Joe Kalash
		uunet!starnine!kalash
		kalash at starnine.com

Disclaimer: StarNine knows nothing about what I am saying.