Should "ls -Rdl" traverse directories?

Guy Harris guy at auspex.auspex.com
Sat May 13 19:09:40 AEST 1989


>What I find even more irksome is that the -R option is there in the first
>place!  If you have to put it in, at least get it right!

The BSD version does it the same way; I tried compiling the vanilla
4.3BSD version (just in case it was changed in SunOS, although I didn't
remember it being so changed), and it also treats "ls -Rld" just like
"ls -ld". 



More information about the Comp.unix.wizards mailing list