FCC doing it again...

Conor P. Cahill cpcahil at virtech.uucp
Tue Nov 28 12:15:14 AEST 1989


In article <21536 at adm.BRL.MIL>, AGRISCS at umcvmb.missouri.edu (Don Ingli) writes:
> Please allow me to express my displeasure with the FCC proposal
> which would authorize a surcharge for the use of modems on the
> telephone network. This regulation is nothing less than an
> attempt to restrict the free exchange of information among the
> growing number of computer users. Calls placed using modems
> require no special telephone company equipment, and users of
> modems pay the phone company for use of the network in the form
> of a monthly bill. In short a modem call is the same as a voice
> call, and should not be subject to any additional charges.

Not that I want to pay a surcharge, but...

A modem phone call is not the same as a voice phone call.  Modem calls are
continuously transmitting tones on the line, while a voice call has lots 
of periods of silence.  This makes modem calls harder to multiplex on the 
phone network than voice calls.


-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Conor P. Cahill     uunet!virtech!cpcahil      	703-430-9247	!
| Virtual Technologies Inc.,    P. O. Box 876,   Sterling, VA 22170     |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+



More information about the Comp.unix.wizards mailing list