Why isn't argv[argc]==(char *)0 ?

[Ken Lee]

In article <3053 at cello.UUCP>, dcm at toysrus.uucp (dcm) writes:
> Argc should always be correct.  Who cares about argv[argc]?

The problem is that some UNIX functions, such as execv, do not take an
argc.  If your system does not force argv[argc]==NULL, you cannot
directly pass your argv (or the last part of it) to execv.

Ken Lee
DEC Western Software Laboratory, Palo Alto, Calif.
Internet: klee at decwrl.dec.com
uucp: uunet!decwrl!klee