why different swapping modes on executables?

[Martin Golding]

In <1991Mar12.104352.23097 at kithrup.COM> sef at kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:

>In article <1991Mar12.012401.557 at nowhere.uucp> sking at nowhere.uucp (Steven King) writes:
>>    While I think I understand what the difference is, I don't understand
>> why the difference. Is there any advantage to one over the other? How
>> does one, short of directly editing the binary, assign one or the other?
>> ( the link editor doesn't offer any clues ) 

>At one point, the linker would just willy-nilly put things back to back.
>For example, text might end at 0x1231, and data would then begin at 0x1232.
>When paging, you do *not* want to use old data.  Therefore, if you want to
>page directly from disk, you arrange things such that everything is in a
>decent arrangement (which is what your kernel would do for you when it
>swapped pages to the swap device).

In the very bad old days, PDP 11's had two ways to map memory: one 
combined the data and program in a single 64k segment, and one had 
separate (64k) data and program spaces. Given the addressing modes, 
the difference between data and program accesses were a study in themselves.
My impression is that the (original) version of the Magic Number was
the actual value to load into the PDP 11 MMU control register, to select
one or the other model.

Martin Golding    | sync, sync, sync, sank ... sunk:
Dod #0236         |  He who steals my code steals trash.
{mcspdx,pdxgate}!adpplz!martin or martin at adpplz.uucp