Xenix 386 v2.3 bug?

William E. Davidsen Jr davidsen at steinmetz.ge.com
Tue Dec 20 09:37:27 AEST 1988


In article <401 at impch.UUCP> egon at impch.UUCP (Lukas Knobloch) writes:
| 
| Hiya
| 
| From time to time we've got problems with our System it means:
| 
| panic:Memory failure - parity error

  I may be able to help. I had a similar problem, and it only occurred
when I was doing floppy disk i/o, therefore no memory test could (or
would) find it.

  After some extensive detective work it turned out the memory failed
only when the CPU and DMA channel were both hitting the same memory. I
started swapping memory, to no avail. If I took out any 1/2MB it went
away, but replacing the memory brought it back.

  I finally found that I had a slow support chip on the memory board,
and when I put more than 1.5MB on it, it failed. Driving the extra load
of more chips, the card just couldn't keep up. At 2.5 it was really
unreliable. After trying to find the chip, I decided to just put the
extra memory on another board and forget it. So far everything is
running just fine, although I will probably go to faster chips when the
prices come down.

  If the problem is not associated with floppy i/o you have some other
problem, and the memory could be at fault as well as the support chips,
but if the memory test runs and the o/s doesn't, it's usually a slow
chip, either memory or support. Hope this helps you (or somebody), the
manufacturer was ready to swear that the problem was in Xenix.
-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu at ge-crd.arpa)
  {uunet | philabs}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me



More information about the Comp.unix.xenix mailing list