Foxbase 2.0 performance

[Ed Hew]

In article <9210 at spool.cs.wisc.edu> thurm at shorty.cs.wisc.edu (Matthew Thurmaier) writes:
>FoxBASE+ 2.10 Performance is FAR greater than foxbase 1.04, provided you
>are running compiled.  It still has some bugs though.

SCO now has (as of about 2 months ago) fox+ 2.1.1a available.  It's
a minor upgrade for registered 2.1.0 owners.  We carry it in stock
(at work), so I would assume that most SCO 3rd level resellers would
have it.  You do have to provide the serial number, in return for
which you get some useful buggy-fixes.

>Matthew J. Thurmaier                ...decvax!garp!harvard!uwvax!thurm
>The Computer Classroom              matt at shorty.cs.wisc.edu

  Ed. A. Hew       Authorized Technical Trainer        Xeni/Con Corporation
  work:  edhew at xenicon.uucp	 -or-	 ..!{uunet!}utai!lsuc!xenicon!edhew
->home:	 edhew at xenitec.on.ca	 -or-	   ..!{uunet!}watmath!xenitec!edhew
    # Justice is only relative to what you can afford to prove in court.