VMS & UNIX comparison rebutal (not a - (nf)
bill at haddock.UUCP
bill at haddock.UUCP
Sat Jul 7 13:43:09 AEST 1984
#R:abnjh:-70200:haddock:16700025:000:756
haddock!bill Jul 5 18:34:00 1984
>A friend of mine (who was one of the first non-DEC people to see VMS)
>described VMS as "like a nightmare about RSX-11M". I've never seen any
>reason to quarrel with this description.
Having worked on one of the Unix emulators which runs under Vms, I
would like to offer a parable:
Defenders of Vms make much of logical names; indeed, try to
imagine VMS without them! However, to redirect via SYS$INPUT,
the translated value could be 63 characters long, maximum (at
least in VMS 3.n. I've been away from it for a while)
Since a VMS pathname can easily be 120+ characters, a user could
end up S.O.L.
VMS is incoherent; Unix is coherent. If the software base appeals to
you, get VMS. I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole.
More information about the Comp.unix
mailing list