ls follies

Alexis Dimitriadis alexis at reed.UUCP
Sun Aug 25 15:56:15 AEST 1985


> >>  What gets me is there is no way to convince ls to produce _unsorted_ 
> >>output!  (never mind why...
> 
> How about ls -f.
> 
  ls -f is fine *if the argument is a single directory*.  
Besides, 4.2BSD ls -f alphabetizes its "directory" arguments, before 
listing each one unsorted.  Try "ls -f b a" to see what I mean...

Alexis Dimitriadis
-- 
_______________________________________________
  As soon as I get a full time job, the opinions expressed above
will attach themselves to my employer, who will never be rid of
them again.

             alexis @ reed

                 ...teneron! \
...seismo!ihnp4! - tektronix! - reed.UUCP
     ...decvax! /



More information about the Comp.unix mailing list