Alternate Shells

Peter da Silva peter at baylor.UUCP
Fri Aug 30 06:30:22 AEST 1985


> (b) We saw little reason for anybody to use any other shell (you must
> remember that csh was new then, and there were no other alternative
> shells).  The only other common shell used was a basic+ interpreter for
> one business class, which was given by the administrator when the class
> accounts were set up.

What about psh? I seem to remember running into a couple of people who
preferred it to csh. I thought they were crazy but that doesn't mean
anything. I frequently think I'm crazy.
-- 
	Peter (Made in Australia) da Silva
		UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter
		MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076



More information about the Comp.unix mailing list