Alternate Shells
Peter da Silva
peter at baylor.UUCP
Fri Aug 30 06:30:22 AEST 1985
> (b) We saw little reason for anybody to use any other shell (you must
> remember that csh was new then, and there were no other alternative
> shells). The only other common shell used was a basic+ interpreter for
> one business class, which was given by the administrator when the class
> accounts were set up.
What about psh? I seem to remember running into a couple of people who
preferred it to csh. I thought they were crazy but that doesn't mean
anything. I frequently think I'm crazy.
--
Peter (Made in Australia) da Silva
UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter
MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076
More information about the Comp.unix
mailing list