Why does "cal" require year <= 9999?

Doug Gwyn <gwyn> gwyn at brl-tgr.ARPA
Sun Jan 19 13:18:01 AEST 1986

Previous message (by thread): an alternative view of memory management [really = shared libs]
Next message (by thread): Why does "cal" require year <= 9999?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Why does "cal" require the year to be <= 9999?

Because it is expected that Congress will redefine the whole calendar
before then.

Previous message (by thread): an alternative view of memory management [really = shared libs]
Next message (by thread): Why does "cal" require year <= 9999?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Comp.unix mailing list