Favorite operating systems query
Henry Spencer
henry at utzoo.UUCP
Thu Jun 26 07:20:09 AEST 1986
> 3) In regards to Unix robustness - I'll make you all a challenge: I'll bet I can
> take a commercially available Unix (BSD based, I don't play w/ AT&T & they
> don't play w/ me) and find twice as many ways to screw it up as you could
> in VMS. This means anything from kernel bugs to application bugs.
Since you have carefully excluded the AT&T Unixes, which are rather better
debugged, you've rigged the comparison. It's no secret that 4BSD is riddled
with bugs -- what else do you expect, given its origin? A university is not
a software house, even if a DoD contract claims that it's supposed to act
like one. If you doubt this, point to the quality-control people at UCB.
> ... Look at tektronix, they claimed to
> have a port of 4.2 with over **2000** bug fixes. 2,000??? In a distribution
> version of Unix? Come on...
What's odd about this? OS/360 averaged 1000 bugs/release for a long time.
That's *unfixed* bugs, mind you.
--
Usenet(n): AT&T scheme to earn
revenue from otherwise-unused Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
late-night phone capacity. {allegra,ihnp4,decvax,pyramid}!utzoo!henry
More information about the Comp.unix
mailing list