How Good is the AT&T 6300 Plus?
Jeff Denenberg
jeffd at ittvax.ATC.ITT.UUCP
Wed Jun 18 23:19:48 AEST 1986
> In article <9885 at ucsfcgl.ucsfcgl.UUCP> russack at ucsfcgl.UUCP (Joe
> Russack%CGL) writes:
> >
> > The pc compatibility is not too good. It is passing, (and much
> > better than unmentionable clones) but not as good as some
> > others (like the ITT, compaq,etc).
> >
> >Joseph Russack
> >
> >!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!russack
>
> point of interest, the 6300 (although i'm not possitive about
> the plus) is made by Olivetti for AT&T. The comperable ITT machine is
> also made by Olivetti. Olivetti sells it themselves as the M24. All
> three machines are identical except for paint and such.
>
> None of this is secret, you can gather as much from the trade
> journals, but how can the ATT differ from the ITT in that respect?
> Must be a case of perspective.
> --
> -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>
> Joseph D. Shapiro "He who hesitates
> Bunker Ramo Information Systems is lunch"
>
> ...ittatc!bunker!shap
> ...decvax!bunker!shap
The "comparable ITT machine" is the ITT XTRA XP. It is made by ITT, not
Olivetti and is a totally different design. The XP uses a 80286 and is a true
pc (not AT) clone with good compatibility. I have used the ITT XTRA XP and it
is, in my opinion, the class of the pc clones.
Jeff Denenberg
..decvax!ittvax!jeffd
More information about the Comp.unix
mailing list