Orphaned Response
bsteve at gorgo.UUCP
bsteve at gorgo.UUCP
Thu May 8 10:36:00 AEST 1986
/* ---------- "Re: Are any parts of UNIX in public" ---------- */
In article <755 at ccird2.UUCP> rb at ccird2.UUCP (Rex Ballard) writes:
>If Cornell had a non-disclosure agreement and let a student or
>faculty member who had not signed a similar agreement see the source,
>Cornel would have been in violation of their AT&T contract. If
>a "hacker" broke into Cornel's computer and "ftp'd" the source
>to his PC, the only protection would be a copyright notice.
This is not entirely true. A piece of software whether or not it
is copyrighted may also be represented as a trade secret. Theft
of a trade secret (though not a crime per se) is a tort. Likewise,
the use of a trade secret for profit is also a tort or willful and
knowing transmission of a trade secret to another person is a tort.
Its a good way to get sued for `TOO MUCH MONEY' :-(
For this reason, things like the C beautifier (Swiped from a V6
system somewhere and redistributed by the C users group) is still
proprietary code. Just sell it and see :-)
Steve (not really a lawyer) Blasingame / Oklahoma City
ihnp4!attmail!sblasingame
More information about the Comp.unix
mailing list