Do you REALLY need hard links?
John Macdonald
jmm at eci386.UUCP
Wed Oct 10 13:18:25 AEST 1990
In article <3718 at zorba.Tynan.COM> jrg at Apple.COM (John R. Galloway Jr.) writes:
|I am interested to know what uses people routinely have for hard links that
|could not be equally well served by symbolic links.
In a system administration reporting package we sell, we regularily
use hard links to link todays report to "Rpt.<day>" where <day> is the
day of the week. Thus we end up with rpt.last being the most recent
report generated, and Rpt.Wed being the report most recently generated
on a Wednesday. This gives an automatic cyclic backup scheme. The
<day> extension is generated by using date, and is controlled by an
locally configurable environment variable which allows the numerical
day of the month to be used instead to provide a 28 to 31 day cycle
rather than a seven day cycle. It would be possible to do the same
with a loop that moved all historical items to the next older name,
however, it is a lot easier to figure out which is the backup from
last Saturday (is it rpt---- or rpt-----?) using our method.
--
Algol 60 was an improvment on most | John Macdonald
of its successors - C.A.R. Hoare | jmm at eci386
More information about the Comp.unix
mailing list