TILE FORTH RELEASE

T. William Wells bill at twwells.com
Thu Dec 21 11:38:03 AEST 1989


In article <15023 at bfmny0.UU.NET> tneff at bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff) writes:
: also since it's UNREASONABLE to expect Usenet FORTH enthusiasts to be
: subscribed to comp.lang.forth (right?) we'll crosspost it to alt.sources!

Wrong premise, wrong conclusion. I'm no forth enthusiast. But I'll
keep the Forth posting. Why? Because I *study* things like that.
But there is NO WAY I'll subscribe to any of several dozen MORE
groups just on the off chance that someone will post something
useful.

Oh yes, a friend of mine I was talking to yesterday said
essentially the same thing....

: OK Ed Vielmetti I take it all back.  There IS something worse than
: re-posting 30k source postings from other groups.... :-(

Yes indeed. Your drivel on this subject.

I have *already* benefitted from Ed's work. I have *not*
benefitted from your whining.

---
Bill                    { uunet | novavax | ankh | sunvice } !twwells!bill
bill at twwells.com



More information about the Alt.sources.d mailing list