Stupid reposting service (was Re: SLIP/getty/printers on Terminal Servers)
Kim DeVaughn
kim at uts.amdahl.com
Sun Dec 17 22:35:34 AEST 1989
In article <1989Dec17.041155.11834 at sq.sq.com>, lee at sq.sq.com (Liam R. E. Quin) writes:
>
> I personally welcome the postings. We have to accept the fact that there
> is too much news to read these days. Sigh.
I agree. I have already pulled a number of useful tidbits off of alt.sources
since this began that I would have otherwise missed (Thanks!)
Possibly something along the lines of reposting short items in their entirety,
and pointers for the longer items would be appropriate. The definitions of
"short" and "long" are somewhat subjective, and should probably stay that way
(I'd hate to see something nice not be reposted simply because it was a few
bytes or lines longer than some arbitrary "rule").
Also, if there is something truly "significant" (again, subjective), I would
not object to it's being reposted to alt.sources ... shouldn't happen very
often anyway.
/kim
P.S. BTW, a complete distribution of a Forth interpreter was just recently
posted to comp.lang.forth in about 7 or 8 parts. It goes by the name
"tile", and uses the GNU license.
Dunno if it's any good or not, but it seems a pity that it'll never get
archived ...
--
UUCP: kim at amdahl.amdahl.com
or: {sun,decwrl,hplabs,pyramid,uunet,oliveb,ames}!amdahl!kim
DDD: 408-746-8462
USPS: Amdahl Corp. M/S 249, 1250 E. Arques Av, Sunnyvale, CA 94086
BIX: kdevaughn GEnie: K.DEVAUGHN CIS: 76535,25
More information about the Alt.sources.d
mailing list