moderation of alt.sources vs. automated harangues

[David C Lawrence]

Kyle> So moderate alt.sources.
Me> Sounds reasonable

In <2645 at pur-phy> ray at dirac.physics.purdue.edu (Ray Moody) writes:
Ray> ... but there is a need for an unmoderated source group, and
Ray> alt.sources fills that need.

Okay, tell us what that need is.  You've not provided any sort of
argument here, only made a claim that you've not attempted to
substantiate.  At least counter the argument with something more than
"Does not, does not!"

Dave
-- 
 (setq mail '("tale at pawl.rpi.edu" "tale at itsgw.rpi.edu" "tale at rpitsmts.bitnet"))