shars and security concerns.

[Peter da Silva]

In article <15441 at bfmny0.UU.NET> tneff at bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff) writes:
> Someone asked whether there should be an RFC for shell archives.  I think
> there should.

I don't. I think there should be an RFC for *text* archives. And I think it
should specify something a bit more formal than a shar. The Software Tools
text archive format is admirably suited to the purpose.

(Where is Brian Kernighan when we need him?)
-- 
`-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180.      <peter at ficc.uu.net>
 'U`  Have you hugged your wolf today?  <peter at sugar.hackercorp.com>
@FIN  Commercial solicitation *is* accepted by email to this address.