QRT 1.5

Sean Casey sean at ms.uky.edu
Sat Mar 25 08:44:45 AEST 1989


In article <1610 at fig.bbn.com> rsalz at bbn.com (Rich Salz) writes:
>AARRGGH!!!
>
>The four QRT postings took up 76K, 26K, 35K, and 80K in my
>spool directory -- four postings.
>
>When I ran uudecode and uncompress I got 200K, 61K, 61K, and 174K;
>this could have fit in eight postings, and I WOULD HAVE HAD SOURCE
>TO READ without doing all that work.
>
>Major bummer, major mistake.

What mistake?

The files uudecoded, uncompressed, and untarred ok. It only took 4 postings
instead of 8. There was source code included. It took me about two minutes
to dearchive everything. Is that a lot of work for a free ray-tracer?

I don't get it.

Sean
-- 
***  Sean Casey                        sean at ms.uky.edu,  sean at ukma.bitnet
***  Who sometimes never learns.       {backbone site|rutgers|uunet}!ukma!sean
***  U of K, Lexington Kentucky, USA  ..where Christian movies are banned.
***  ``Freedom is the ability to say 2+2=4. Given that, all else follows.''



More information about the Alt.sources mailing list