volatile

[Chris Torek]

In article <4727 at ihlpf.ATT.COM> nevin1 at ihlpf.ATT.COM (00704a-Liber) writes:
>... If it can't be well-defined, it shouldn't be in the language.

This line of reasoning also rules out integer-to-pointer casts,
as I noted earlier:

	struct rkdevice *rkaddr = (struct rkdevice *)0777440;

I am perfectly happy with ill-defined constructs.  (I consider other
some arguments for and against volatile valid.)
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)
Domain:	chris at mimsy.umd.edu	Path:	uunet!mimsy!chris