Recommend a C compiler?

[Steve Pool]

In article <3587 at uwovax.uwo.ca> 2014_5001 at uwovax.uwo.ca writes:
>In article <3642 at ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>, SMITHJ at ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:
>> In article <660054 at hpclwjm.HP.COM>, walter at hpclwjm.HP.COM (Walter Murray) writes:
>> 
>>> I know C but am a total novice in the world of PC compatibles.
>>> Which compiler should I buy for my home use?  I want good quality,
>>> a commitment to ANSI C...
>
>Turbo C.  It seems to have a better ANSI C compatibility than Microsoft. 
>(Maybe this has changed under 5.0--I only found an incompatibility in 4.0).

MSC 4.0 is ancient history.

>Perhaps you reviewed an old version of TurboC.  If you have the manuals, you
>find that the project facility allows a beautifully elegant way of linking in
>both .LIB's and .OBJ's.

Which is almost identical to the method used in QuickC 1.0, 1.01, and 2.0.

>The QuickC user-interface is driven towards a mouse.

The QuickC UI offers an OPTION, unlike Turbo.  Every function performed
with the aid of a mouse may be performed equally well with accelerator
keys.

>Turbo C provides online hypertext manuals.

As does QuickC 2.0, including fully hyperlinked, functioning example
programs for every library function.

>It does not support many display adapters.  Glancing through the manual, all I
>could find was CGA/EGA/VGA support.  Where is Herc, ATT6300?

Hercules graphics have been supported since version 1.0.  AT&T support was
added with version 2.0.

Perhaps you should do more than glance through the manual.

Disclaimer:  I'm merely a pitiful summer hire, not involved with QuickC in
any job-related capacity.  I use it when writing my OWN code under MS-DOS,
and my personal feeling is that it's a slick piece of work.