Eunice/Unity
Keith Bostic
keith at seismo.UUCP
Sat Jul 14 07:25:08 AEST 1984
I would like to see some responses to this inquiry posted to the net. I have
worked somewhat extensively on EUNICE; the only other VMS/UNIX fake shell
I've seen was one developed by some students while I was in school.
As far as EUNICE goes, it's fine for all of the standard stuff -- if you want
to run under VMS and just devlop under UNIX, EUNICE gives you the shells,
job control, etc. etc. On the down side, if you want to do *anything*
interesting in UNIX (either shell or C/stdio), EUNICE is extremely buggy.
For example, SIGPIPE is missing; programs are never informed of a broken
pipe situation. Sections 2 and 3 of the manual are supported, but only
casually.
I haven't seen much discussion in this newsgroup (don't know if y'all
exhausted the possibilities months ago or what) how about a lively
commentary on the virtues of EUNICE vs. PHOENIX vs. UNITY? Are there
others out there? And is Wollongong *really* doing S5?
Keith
ARPA: keith at seismo
UUCP: seismo!keith
*UNIX is trademarked, blah, blah, blah, by whoever it is.
More information about the Comp.os.eunice
mailing list