anyone have nn working under 3.1

[Gary M. Lin]

In article <1801 at diemen.utas.edu.au> carl at tasis.eecs.utas.edu.au (Carl Lewis) writes:
>Does anyone have nn working under 3.1 ?  Getting it to compile isn't a problem.
>
>The problem starts when nn trys to write to the screen .  Using
>the USE_TERMCAP flag causes what look like cursor addressing problems.
>Using the USE_TERMINFO flag causes things to go missing when written
>to the screen (like the article titles and authors names etc)

	I can't vouch for 3.1 (our IBM CE 'asked' for our evaluation model
	back before we had any fun with it), but nn 1.69 ran correctly
	under release 9022 after tweaking the source code.

	Never had a problem with the termcap, and ran extremely well under
	aixterm.  Which systerm-dependent include files are you using?


------
INTERNET:  sequoia at ucscb.UCSC.EDU		Gary M. Lin
	   quantum at slugmail.UCSC.EDU		Computer Engineering
UUCP: !ucbvax!ucscc!ucscb!sequoia		Cowell College, UC Santa Cruz