Come on, stop blaming/flaming SCO!

[Peter da Silva]

In article <229 at pcssc.UUCP> dma at pcssc.UUCP (Dave Armbrust) writes:
> Lets take Lyrix as an example. ... comp.unix.sco.lyrix I beleive would make
> more sense then comp.unix.i386.apps.lyrix.

And since Lyrix isn't locked into SCO, comp.unix.apps.lyrix makes even
more sense.
-- 
`-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180.      <peter at ficc.uu.net>
 'U`  Have you hugged your wolf today?  <peter at sugar.hackercorp.com>
@FIN  Commercial solicitation *is* accepted by email to this address.