c.u.wizards vs. c.u.internals

[Paul Graham]

jfh at rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) writes:
|
|Well, I'm tending to agree with Doug Gwyn.  Doug's statement was
|that he wouldn't be able to discuss UNIX internals because his
|license prohibited him from doing so.  Since I don't have a copy
|of the non-disclosure agreements I signed with AT&T and IBM, I
|think I too will have to bow out.

are you saying that although you know that the group is intended to replace
unix.wizards you won't post because the name changed?  even though you
could post before.  this stuff about licenses is bogus.

|This voting business is really beginning to look pretty silly.
|What we really need is a good backbone cabal.

right.
-- 
pjg at acsu.buffalo.edu / rutgers!ub!pjg / pjg at ubvms