shell architecture (to glob or not to glob)

[Stephen Vinoski]

In article <4584 at lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard at thesis1.hsch.utexas.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
>In article <365 at bria> mike at bria.UUCP (Michael Stefanik) writes:
>>The real challenge is to provide an end-user interface that is simple to
>>use, and covers most of the bases.  However, a fundamental deviation from
>>the philosphy of "power to the programmer" would be a major mistake, in my
>>mind anyhow.
>
>Unix is at the far end of the scale: it's actively user-hostile. Power to
>the programmer means incomprehensibility to the user. I wouldn't even
>consider handing a user a raw $ or % prompt, X terminal or not. It's simply
>too daunting. Unix' terseness is a win for a programmer, but a major loss
>for a user. It took me two years of running a Unix system at home before I
>got comfortable with it, and I'm a systems programmer by trade. How long
>does it take a user?

Thank you for reinforcing my opinion of those who call themselves "systems
programmers."  Two years?  Sheesh!


-steve


| Steve Vinoski  (508)256-6600 x5904       | Internet: vinoski at apollo.hp.com  |
| Testability and Diagnostics              | UUCP: ...mit-eddie!apollo!vinoski|
| HP Apollo Division, Chelmsford, MA 01824 |       ...uw-beaver!apollo!vinoski|