diskless -- ULTDL030 subset

Stefan Brandle stefan at wheaton.UUCP
Tue Jul 31 00:12:36 AEST 1990


In article <22100008 at ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> kbesrl at ux1.cso.uiuc.edu writes:

>I need to install ULTDL031 subset before I do anything else.  However,
>ULTDL031 depends on ULTDL030 and so I cannot install it without ULTDL030.

You can get around this by doing a `touch /usr/adm/subsets/ULTDL030.lk' to
create the lock file that claims the software set is loaded.  I had the problem
back aways when trying to load DECnet on a 3.1c machine and DECnet went bananas
claiming it couldn't be loaded because it couldn't find Ultrix 3.0 loaded on
the machine -- they have a generic V3.0 DECnet that doesn't realize that Ultrix
3.1 is a kosher substitute for 3.0.

>Is there such a subset?  Is it really needed (otherwise, I can edit
>ULTDL031.ctrl and remove the DEPS="ULTDL030" line from it)?  If it is
>needed, how can I get it?

You can always fake it and see if it blows up (:-).  Somebody who knows what
they're talking about should probably answer this.

-sb
-- 
---------------------------------------------- MA Bell: (708) 260-4110 ---------
Stefan Brandle                  UUCP: ...!{obdient,uunet!tellab5}!wheaton!stefan
Wheaton College			or	stefan at wheaton.UUCP
Wheaton, IL 60187 		"But I never claimed to be sane!"



More information about the Comp.unix.ultrix mailing list