diskless -- ULTDL030 subset
Stefan Brandle
stefan at wheaton.UUCP
Tue Jul 31 00:12:36 AEST 1990
In article <22100008 at ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> kbesrl at ux1.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
>I need to install ULTDL031 subset before I do anything else. However,
>ULTDL031 depends on ULTDL030 and so I cannot install it without ULTDL030.
You can get around this by doing a `touch /usr/adm/subsets/ULTDL030.lk' to
create the lock file that claims the software set is loaded. I had the problem
back aways when trying to load DECnet on a 3.1c machine and DECnet went bananas
claiming it couldn't be loaded because it couldn't find Ultrix 3.0 loaded on
the machine -- they have a generic V3.0 DECnet that doesn't realize that Ultrix
3.1 is a kosher substitute for 3.0.
>Is there such a subset? Is it really needed (otherwise, I can edit
>ULTDL031.ctrl and remove the DEPS="ULTDL030" line from it)? If it is
>needed, how can I get it?
You can always fake it and see if it blows up (:-). Somebody who knows what
they're talking about should probably answer this.
-sb
--
---------------------------------------------- MA Bell: (708) 260-4110 ---------
Stefan Brandle UUCP: ...!{obdient,uunet!tellab5}!wheaton!stefan
Wheaton College or stefan at wheaton.UUCP
Wheaton, IL 60187 "But I never claimed to be sane!"
More information about the Comp.unix.ultrix
mailing list