RAxx disk partitons

[Chris Torek]

In article <4539 at brl-smoke.ARPA> conley%ukans.csnet at RELAY.CS.NET
(Dennis R. Conley) writes:
>Once again, I am compelled to ponder the rationale behind the choice
>of partition sizes for RA disks ( in particular, those for ra81's in
>4.3 ).

`Rationale'?  You mean there is one?

(There is a tiny bit of merit in making the `a' partition the same
size as most other `a' partitions.  But we threw out the `standard'
tables long ago.)
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 1516)
UUCP:	seismo!umcp-cs!chris
CSNet:	chris at umcp-cs		ARPA:	chris at mimsy.umd.edu