reply to 4.3BSD or Ultrix
HAL%USU.BITNET at wiscvm.arpa
HAL%USU.BITNET at wiscvm.arpa
Wed Sep 24 10:33:19 AEST 1986
Subject: 4.3BSD or Ultrix?
> My organization's backbone networks is Decnet which I can't talk.
> since I have two VAX (11/780, and 11/750) and a Sun (3/160) running under
> UNIX 4.2BSD. Since is a must that my VAX 11/780 becomes a network node
> I'm facing two alternatives :
> 1) I convert my 780 into a Ultrix machine.
> 2) I prove that Ultrix is not quite 4.2BSD and that the conversion
> will be more expensive than to buy a uVax to be used as gateway.
> My intuition tells me to stick to UNIX and get a uVax, but I need
> more arguments than that, to convince my administration. Any info
> concerning this issue will be very much appreciated.
> Carlos Perez
> Department of Electrical Engineering
> Concordia University
> Montreal, Canada
> UUCP: {decvax}!utcsri!musocs!deervax!carlos
>
There is possibly a third alternative:
A company called Technology Concepts Inc. markets a
generic DECnet that reportedly runs on 4.xBSD, called
CommUnity. Their literature claims it is compatible
with DECnet Phase IV, UNIX as an operating system.
their address is:
Technology Concepts Inc.
40 Tall Pine Drive
Sudbury, Mass 01776
(617)443-7311
We are not using the product ourselves because we chose
Ultrix. We migrated from Eunice on VMS. I suspect that
#2 above might or might not be correct depending on what
must be converted. We converted Writers Workbench from
Eunice(4.1bsd?!) to Ultrix with no problems, but we have
yet to get S working 100%. DECnet Ultrix works real well.
File copies, remote rm's ls's and cat's are easy both ways.
Task to task communications with VMS is a piece of cake.
All our printing and tape work is done over the network
to VMS machines.
hal
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list