/dev/fd

John Temples john at jwt.UUCP
Thu Apr 13 04:57:54 AEST 1989


In article <16817 at mimsy.UUCP> chris at mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
>shuffle puts them back), then the ksh syntax
>
>	shuffle <(process1) <(process2)
>
>produces on standard output the combined output of the two processes,

I tried this (with diff, not shuffle) on two different kshs, and both barfed
on the syntax.  Is this only supported under certain versions of ksh or Unix?
-- 
John Temples - UUCP: {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd}!peora!rtmvax!bilver!jwt!john



More information about the Comp.unix.wizards mailing list