Erratum 21 (Was: Re: SCO Xenix System Hang)

Dr. T. Andrews tanner at ki4pv.uucp
Mon Dec 26 23:02:06 AEST 1988


In article <17383 at conexch.UUCP>, root at conexch.UUCP (Larry Dighera) writes:
) It would seem reasonable to approach Intel about replacing a buggy
) chip with one of their new DX parts.  How could they refuse?

I suppose that they could refuse in the same way that they refused to
replace the parts which didn't work in "native" mode.  If they refuse
to replace an alleged "32-bit" CPU which doesn't work in 32-bit mode,
surely they can refuse to replace for something minor like this!
-- 
...!bikini.cis.ufl.edu!ki4pv!tanner  ...!bpa!cdin-1!cdis-1!ki4pv!tanner
or...  {allegra killer gatech!uflorida decvax!ucf-cs}!ki4pv!tanner



More information about the Comp.unix.xenix mailing list