dosread.c again

[Clayton Cramer]

In article <3721 at ast.cs.vu.nl>, ast at cs.vu.nl (Andy Tanenbaum) writes:
> In article <3a18.2536ede8 at ibmpcug.co.uk> ronald at ibmpcug.co.uk (Ronald Khoo) writes:
> >Does this prove anything ?
> 
> Not to me.  My knowledge of DOS is zilch, and will stay that way.  Thus I
> leave the debugging of dosread.c to the net.  Since I never use DOS and do
> not own any DOS files, I don't care much whether it works or not, but if
> there is someone who does care, by all means try it and if there are problems,
> try to fix them.
> 
> Andy Tanenbaum

This posting is really the definitive statement of disdain for DOS.
"My knowledge of DOS is zilch, and will stay that way."  For anyone
to make such a statement, along with the contempt shown in the rest
of the posting, provides all the evidence needed that elitism has
a lot more to do with DOS-hatred than anything else.

I'm sure that if DOS weren't used by COMMON PEOPLE, the DOS-haters
would make appropriate criticisms of the many very real deficiencies
of DOS, and leave it at that.  But as long as someone can learn to
use a computer without devoting years of their life to it, the
DOS-haters will remain filled with irrational hatred.
-- 
Clayton E. Cramer {pyramid,pixar,tekbspa}!optilink!cramer
Human rights are non-negotiable -- respect the Bill of Rights, or you'll soon
find out why the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear arms.
Disclaimer?  You must be kidding!  No company would hold opinions like mine!