The world is not ready for 'volatile'

[Doug Gwyn]

In article <15166 at mimsy.UUCP> chris at mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
>... ["register"] implies not-volatile and
>not-aliased; and it does so in a way that the compiler can reasonably
>enforce.

No, I reject this claim.  A STORAGE CLASS by no means obviates the
need for type qualifiers.  You could conceivably invent a language
with only type qualifiers (one of which you may choose to name
"register") and no storage classes, but it wouldn't be reasonable
to call that language "C".